Seven analysis modes designed to assist experienced estimators, preconstruction managers, and document reviewers in evaluating bid packages. Results are informational and should be independently verified.
Each mode targets a specific risk area of your bid package. Run one — or run them all together.
Identifies missing details, undefined assemblies, incomplete schedules, and information gaps across all disciplines.
Detects conflicts between disciplines: mechanical vs structural, electrical vs architectural, technology vs security.
Evaluates whether designs can be built efficiently with standard construction methods and reasonable sequencing.
Surfaces risks that experienced preconstruction managers would flag during bid package evaluation.
Identifies areas where scope responsibility between trades is unclear or undefined.
Evaluates whether the document set is complete enough for contractors to provide accurate pricing.
Flags issues that commonly result in change orders based on real-world construction experience.
Combine every mode for a complete review of your bid package — findings organized by discipline, category, and risk level.
Every finding arrives with the practical context an experienced reviewer would attach: the document reference, why it matters, what it could cost, and a draft RFI you can submit.
Mechanical ↔ Structural · M-501.2 · S-301 · Grid line C
The mechanical layout routes 24" ducts through the same bay as a deep structural beam. Left unaddressed, this becomes a guaranteed RFI during submittals and a likely duct reroute.
Typical exposure: $8K–$15K change order plus 1–2 weeks of submittal delays.
“Confirm the duct route at grid line C, Level 3. Is a beam penetration, duct resize, or reroute intended?”
Architectural ↔ Specs · Div 09 · A-420 · A-421
The gypsum assembly specification is never keyed on the plans. Bidders must guess which walls get which assembly — and guesses get priced into contingencies or claimed later.
Undefined assemblies are a classic change order trigger during closeout walkthroughs.
“Provide a gypsum assembly key plan showing where each Section 09 21 23 assembly applies.”
Flooring ↔ Drywall · A-930 · Finish Schedule
Corridor base, cap flashings, and transition strips are listed as “TBD.” Trade boundaries between flooring and drywall are unclear, so both subs will exclude the work.
Unpriced scope surfaces as a gap nobody bid — someone pays for it, usually after negotiation.
“Complete the Level 2 corridor finishes and clarify which trade furnishes and installs transitions.”
Estimators get days — sometimes hours — to review hundreds of pages. PX360 helps you focus on what matters.
The issues senior reviewers know to hunt for are organized and surfaced for your whole team.
A question at bid time is an RFI. The same question in the field is a change order.
Example findings shown for illustration. PX360 results are informational and require independent professional verification.
The analysis methodology focuses on document relationships and coordination — not building type assumptions.
Get a Sample PX360 Analysis
See what a PX360 findings report looks like — organized findings, document references, risk categories, and suggested next steps. We'll only use your email for PX360 information you request.
Point PX360 at your documents and run the review modes your project needs.
Seven analysis modes — one coordinated review of your package.
PX360 findings are informational and require independent professional verification before use in bid, pricing, or construction decisions.