PX360 helps identify potential design gaps, coordination issues, missing scope, and constructability concerns across architectural, structural, MEP, fire protection, and site drawings.
Review risk earlier. Ask better questions. Build with fewer surprises.
"The most expensive problems are usually discovered too late."
1 free analysis included. No credit card required.
PX360 provides informational, AI-assisted analysis only. Results may be incomplete and should be independently verified. Users are solely responsible for all decisions.
Spec Section 23 05 00 references a 400-ton chiller but mechanical plans do not show equipment location or required clearances.
A structured review of your document package — organized into findings you can act on.
Drawings, specifications, schedules, addenda and supporting project documents.
PX360 evaluates project information across documents and disciplines.
See organized findings, document references, risk categories and suggested next steps.
Built for construction document review · Results remain subject to professional verification
Every finding includes the discipline, category, document references, why it matters, and a suggested next step.
Sample findings shown for illustration. Your results will reference your project's documents and sheets.
Mechanical duct routing appears to conflict with structural framing at the indicated location.
Potential coordination issue requiring clarification before installation.
Confirm routing and clearance requirements with the design team.
Panel schedules referenced in the electrical drawings are not included in the bid set.
Contractors cannot accurately price electrical distribution without panel schedules.
Request the missing panel schedules via RFI before bid submission.
Finish schedule references floor products not defined in the specifications.
Undefined materials leave pricing open to assumption and create change order exposure.
Confirm finish products and specification sections with the design team.
Built for construction document review · Results remain subject to professional verification
Get a Sample PX360 Analysis
See what a PX360 findings report looks like — organized findings, document references, risk categories, and suggested next steps. We'll only use your email for PX360 information you request.
See It In Action
Construction document issues are easier to address during review than after work is underway. PX360 provides another layer of document review to help project teams identify questions worth asking earlier.
Project teams often have limited time to review hundreds of pages of drawings, specifications, and supporting documents before critical decisions are made.
The most successful projects identify design gaps, coordination issues, missing scope, and constructability concerns before they impact budget, schedule, or construction.
PX360 helps bring a second layer of intelligence to your document review process, helping teams uncover potential issues while they are still inexpensive to solve.
From upload to full risk report in under 5 minutes. No training. No setup. Just results.
Drop your entire bid package — drawings, specs, addenda, schedules. Any format.
All major trades reviewed simultaneously: structural, MEP, civil, architectural, fire protection.
Possible coordination conflicts, scope gaps, code risks, and constructability issues highlighted for further evaluation.
Findings ranked by severity with cost impact, discipline, and suggested RFI language.
Seven analysis modes built from how senior estimators, preconstruction managers, and construction managers actually review bid packages.
Disciplines Covered
Ductwork, piping, and structural clashes across disciplines flagged before field problems.
Equipment shown without power, piping, structural support, or required infrastructure.
Egress, fire protection, accessibility, and life safety issues before they become violations.
Congested ceilings, tight mechanical rooms, equipment access, and installation challenges.
Long lead items: generators, switchgear, elevators, large AHUs identified early.
Drawings across disciplines that don't coordinate — caught before the RFI avalanche.
Every finding includes the full context, cost impact, and a suggested RFI — not just a flag.
Structural drawings show concrete shear walls on Grids C and F without penetration sleeves for MEP crossings. Mechanical and electrical drawings route ductwork and conduit through these walls at multiple elevations, but no coordination has occurred. Field drilling of structural concrete post-pour will require engineering review and is a common source of costly RFIs.
Issue RFI to structural engineer requesting penetration sleeve schedule for all shear walls at Grid Lines C and F. Coordinate with mechanical and electrical engineers to confirm routing locations and required sleeve sizes before concrete is poured.
Every professional who needs to understand construction risk before it costs money.
Help surface potential scope gaps before you bid and before you build.
Reduce pricing assumptions. Help identify potential risks before your number goes out the door.
Reduce RFIs and support your design review with an additional layer of document analysis.
Gain additional insight before approving documents. Understand potential risks before breaking ground.
Upload a construction document package and put PX360 to work.
PX360 findings are informational and require independent professional verification before use in bid, pricing, or construction decisions.